6 New York Times Co V United States Full Text 403 U S 713 1971 New york times co. v. united states: the first amendment overrides the federal government’s interest in keeping certain documents, such as the pentagon papers, classified. The government contends that the only issue in these cases is whether, in a suit by the united states, “the first amendment bars a court from prohibiting a newspaper from publishing material whose disclosure would pose a ‘grave and immediate danger to the security of the united states.’” . . .
About New York Times V United States We granted certiorari, 403 u.s. 942, 943, 91 s.ct. 2270, 2271, 29 l.ed.2d 853 (1971) in these cases in which the united states seeks to enjoin the new york times and the washington post from publishing the contents of a classified study entitled 'history of u.s. decision making process on viet nam policy.'. In what became known as the "pentagon papers case," the nixon administration attempted to prevent the new york times and washington post from publishing materials belonging to a classified defense department study regarding the history of united states activities in vietnam. New york times co. v. united states, 403 u.s. 713 (1971), was a landmark decision of the supreme court of the united states on the first amendment right to freedom of the press. The government contends that the only issue in these cases is whether in a suit by the united states, ‘the first amendment bars a court from prohibiting a newspaper [741] from publishing material whose disclosure would pose a ‘grave and immediate danger to the security of the united states.‘‘.
Free Press Quote New York Times Co V United States 403 U S 713 New york times co. v. united states, 403 u.s. 713 (1971), was a landmark decision of the supreme court of the united states on the first amendment right to freedom of the press. The government contends that the only issue in these cases is whether in a suit by the united states, ‘the first amendment bars a court from prohibiting a newspaper [741] from publishing material whose disclosure would pose a ‘grave and immediate danger to the security of the united states.‘‘. U.s. reports: new york times co. v. united states, 403 u.s. 713 (1971). citations are generated automatically from bibliographic data as a convenience, and may not be complete or accurate. supreme court of the united states. . 1970. periodical. retrieved from the library of congress, < loc.gov item usrep403713 >. Constitutional text the first amendment reads: congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. The case arose when the united states government sought injunctions against the new york times and the washington post to prevent them from publishing classified information regarding the vietnam war, specifically documents known as the pentagon papers. The supreme court of the united states (supreme court) held that the government failed to meet the requisite burden of proof needed to justify a prior restraint of expression when attempting to enjoin the new york times and washington post from publishing contents of a classified study.
Free Press Quote New York Times Co V United States 403 U S 713 U.s. reports: new york times co. v. united states, 403 u.s. 713 (1971). citations are generated automatically from bibliographic data as a convenience, and may not be complete or accurate. supreme court of the united states. . 1970. periodical. retrieved from the library of congress, < loc.gov item usrep403713 >. Constitutional text the first amendment reads: congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. The case arose when the united states government sought injunctions against the new york times and the washington post to prevent them from publishing classified information regarding the vietnam war, specifically documents known as the pentagon papers. The supreme court of the united states (supreme court) held that the government failed to meet the requisite burden of proof needed to justify a prior restraint of expression when attempting to enjoin the new york times and washington post from publishing contents of a classified study.
Comments are closed.