Are Free Flights Possible A Beginners Guide To Travel Hacking

Reward Travel 101: Beginner's Guide To Free Flights & Hotels | Travel ...

Reward Travel 101: Beginner's Guide To Free Flights & Hotels | Travel ... Are there any questions i should be asking? is there any articles available on the subject? my instinct is that in the two questions above, it should be 'are' as the subjects of the sentences (. Which is correct in the following example? "the following staff are/is (?) absent today: john doe jane doe bob doe".

Travel Hacking 101: Beginner's Guide To Free Flights & Hotels | Travel ...

Travel Hacking 101: Beginner's Guide To Free Flights & Hotels | Travel ... Is it correct to say, the team that will be attending with me is listed below: or should i say the team that will be attending with me are listed below. I was just wondering, how can we differentiate "are you done?" and "have you done?", and what is the appropriate way to use each?. @davidschwartz the complete sentence is "since it is virtually impossible to objectively define a set of characteristics in a society that is/are desirable for everyone, …". but in my understanding (though i am not a native speaker) is, that the is/are has to refer either to the set or the characteristics and therefore the beginning of the sentence doesn't matter. I agree. if the op's sentences are the beginning of a paragraph or statement, they should be "what is the name of the company? the name of the company is ." suppose the company referred to is "general eccentric". you could write "the name of the company is general eccentric" (with the before name), or "general eccentric is the name of the company" (with no the before the actual name).

Travel Hacking 101: Beginner's Guide To Free Flights & Hotels | Hotel ...

Travel Hacking 101: Beginner's Guide To Free Flights & Hotels | Hotel ... @davidschwartz the complete sentence is "since it is virtually impossible to objectively define a set of characteristics in a society that is/are desirable for everyone, …". but in my understanding (though i am not a native speaker) is, that the is/are has to refer either to the set or the characteristics and therefore the beginning of the sentence doesn't matter. I agree. if the op's sentences are the beginning of a paragraph or statement, they should be "what is the name of the company? the name of the company is ." suppose the company referred to is "general eccentric". you could write "the name of the company is general eccentric" (with the before name), or "general eccentric is the name of the company" (with no the before the actual name). In my idiolect it should be "is," because "of 378 vehicles" modifies "total," which is the complement of the verb. but many people seem to see "a total of" as a modifier of "378 vehicles," so they see "378 vehicles" as the complement of the verb and say "are." consult your favorite style guide; it ought to weigh in one way or another on this question. Possible duplicate: are collective nouns always plural, or are certain ones singular? which is correct: the rest of the staff is or are? the rest of my family is or are? i've done a bit of re. I have been confused for so long about the plural and singular forms of "people". i want to put an end to this confusion. what is the difference between these following expressions, and is it corr. Given that it is a necessity that both instruments sound true during the show, we could say that the sentence is trying to express the urgency of tuning the instruments. therefore, it can be that " have to be " is most appropriate in this context, although both versions are grammatically acceptable. as dan added, context is lacking to precisely pin down the correct one. looking at difference.

Are Free Flights Possible? A Beginner's Guide To Travel Hacking

Are Free Flights Possible? A Beginner's Guide To Travel Hacking In my idiolect it should be "is," because "of 378 vehicles" modifies "total," which is the complement of the verb. but many people seem to see "a total of" as a modifier of "378 vehicles," so they see "378 vehicles" as the complement of the verb and say "are." consult your favorite style guide; it ought to weigh in one way or another on this question. Possible duplicate: are collective nouns always plural, or are certain ones singular? which is correct: the rest of the staff is or are? the rest of my family is or are? i've done a bit of re. I have been confused for so long about the plural and singular forms of "people". i want to put an end to this confusion. what is the difference between these following expressions, and is it corr. Given that it is a necessity that both instruments sound true during the show, we could say that the sentence is trying to express the urgency of tuning the instruments. therefore, it can be that " have to be " is most appropriate in this context, although both versions are grammatically acceptable. as dan added, context is lacking to precisely pin down the correct one. looking at difference.

How to Travel for FREE with Points and Miles (Beginner's Guide)