About New York Times V United States New york times co. v. united states was an important supreme court decision in first amendment jurisprudence. also known as the “pentagon papers case," it powerfully affirmed the freedom of the press and set a high bar for government attempts to censor the media. Facts of the case: the nixon administration attempted to prevent new york times and washington post from publishing materials belonging to a classified defense department study regarding the history of us activities in vietnam in the “pentagon papers case”.
Defending Free Press New York Times V United States A Case Course Often referred to as the “pentagon papers” case, the landmark supreme court decision in new york times co. v. united states, 403 u.s. 713 (1971), defended the first amendment right of free press against prior restraint by the government. This documentary examines the first amendment’s protection of a free press as well as the historic origins of this right and the ramifications of the landmark ruling in new york times v. united states, the pentagon papers case, in which the u.s. supreme court ruled that prior restraint is unconstitutional. justice hugo black wrote: “only a. In new york times co. v. united states, the united states government sought to prevent the new york times and the washington post from publishing a classified government report titled "history of u.s. decision making process on viet nam policy," commonly known as the pentagon papers. The case of course raises important and difficult problems about the constitutional right of free speech and of the free press and we’ve heard much about that from the press in the last two weeks. but it also raises important questions of the equally fundamental and important right of the government to function.
Required Supreme Court Case New York Times V United States 1971рџ ў In new york times co. v. united states, the united states government sought to prevent the new york times and the washington post from publishing a classified government report titled "history of u.s. decision making process on viet nam policy," commonly known as the pentagon papers. The case of course raises important and difficult problems about the constitutional right of free speech and of the free press and we’ve heard much about that from the press in the last two weeks. but it also raises important questions of the equally fundamental and important right of the government to function. In the original court case on freedom of press versus national security, the case was against the new york times as a publishing company and not against daniel ellsberg, the defense department analyst who provided copies of the classified documents. Justice hugo black (j. black): the press must be free to publish the news without censorship, injunctions or prior restraints. justice william douglas (j. douglas): the purpose of the first amendment of the united states constitution (constitution) is to prevent the government from suppressing embarrassing information. The nixon administration attempted to stop the new york times and washington post from publishing materials pertaining to a classified defense department report regarding united states action in vietnam. the supreme court found that prior restraint was unjustified because publication would not cause immediate harm to american forces. The decision in new york times co. v. united states was hailed as a landmark victory for press freedom. the ruling affirmed that the government could not use vague claims of national security to suppress the publication of information that was in the public interest.
Comments are closed.