Developmental Evaluation Vs Traditional Evaluation From Patton 2012 Patton (2006) explains the differences between traditional and developmental evaluation. a summary version of these differences is presented below: traditional evaluation (te): supports improvement, summative tests and accountability. developmental evaluation (de): supports development of innovation and adaptation in dynamic environments. The waaeh outcomes measurement framework offers a revitalised and reconceptualised approach to the research and evaluation of homelessness.
Developmental Evaluation Vs Traditional Evaluation From Patton 2012 When should developmental evaluation be used? developmental evaluation is best suited to programs still being developed, to existing programs undergoing redesign or situations where complex issues or crises have arisen that require programs to be significantly altered (gamble, 2008; patton, 2011). Some of the main differences between developmental and traditional evaluation are as follows (see patton 2006, dozois et. al. 2010). Distinguish between situations where enough is known to engage in traditional planning and evaluation, and situations where the complex nature of the problem necessitates emergent, innovative engagement and use of developmental evaluation as the appropriately aligned approach. This entry defines evaluation, describes how developmental evaluation differs from other approaches to evaluation, and explains how developmental evaluation is informed by systems thinking and complexity theory.
Evaluating Program Effectiveness An In Depth Review Of Michael Q Distinguish between situations where enough is known to engage in traditional planning and evaluation, and situations where the complex nature of the problem necessitates emergent, innovative engagement and use of developmental evaluation as the appropriately aligned approach. This entry defines evaluation, describes how developmental evaluation differs from other approaches to evaluation, and explains how developmental evaluation is informed by systems thinking and complexity theory. Developmental evaluation supports and nurtures the innovative process and improves its likelihood of success instead of being an obstacle, something that slows the process down (which is how many view the traditional evaluation process). While formative and summative approaches are focused on improving or assessing an established initiative, developmental evaluation aims to generate timely learning to assist development before there is a complete model to improve or assess (dozois, langlois & blanchet cohen, 2010). Patton clearly points out that developmental evaluation is not right for every situation. in fact, he explicitly outlines five purposes and uses: (a) ongoing develop ment, (b) adapting effective general principles to a new context, (c) developing a rapid response, (d) preformative development of a potentially scalable innovation, and (e) major. The evaluator's primary function in the team is to elucidate team discussions with evaluative questions, data and logic, and facilitate data based decision making in the developmental process.
Comments are closed.