Flat Earth Theory Flight Paths Hopuub They draw these flight paths on the flat earth map and show that, on a flat earth, this is the most direct route, and what appears to be the most direct route on a globe, on a flat earth becomes much, much longer. Expected travel times between airports would be very different if we lived on a flat earth. for example, flying from sydney, australia to santiago, chile wo.
Flat Earth Theory Flight Paths Jopuxp Based on our research, we rate false the claim that planes flying "straight and level" prove the earth is flat. that concept doesn't mean planes are flying in a literal straight line. Flights from new zealand to argentina connect through the u.s., which only makes sense if the earth is flat. the video relies on a map projection that distorts directions to make auckland, san francisco, houston, and buenos aires appear to form a nearly straight line. on a globe, this is false. The "flight patterns flat earth" theory struggles to explain long distance flights accurately. it often requires contorted explanations or claims of deliberate deception by airlines, as standard flight paths and distances are easily explained on a globe earth. A common case they would bring is emergency landings. they would draw straight lines between flight origin and destination, once on a mercator map (which they refer as something like ‘ball earth map’), and once on the supposed ‘flat earth map’.
Flat Earth Theory Flight Paths Nbvmbstocks The "flight patterns flat earth" theory struggles to explain long distance flights accurately. it often requires contorted explanations or claims of deliberate deception by airlines, as standard flight paths and distances are easily explained on a globe earth. A common case they would bring is emergency landings. they would draw straight lines between flight origin and destination, once on a mercator map (which they refer as something like ‘ball earth map’), and once on the supposed ‘flat earth map’. Flat earthers explain flights from australia to africa by claiming they follow a straight line on a flat earth map. they argue direct routes, like johannesburg to perth, support this view. however, consistent flight durations and aviation routes provide evidence of a spherical earth, contradicting their theory. Explain the flight path argument. from my understanding ppl say that because pilots use paths that are not parallel with the latitude lines that proves that the earth is a disc. are pilots required to fly routes near land in case of emergency?. Misconception 2: flight paths and airline navigation disprove a round earth many flat earth advocates argue that the shortest routes—great circle paths—are inconsistent with a spherical earth or that flight patterns are manipulated to support a flat earth model. in reality, airline navigation relies heavily on principles of spherical trigonometry, with routes calculated to be the shortest. Flight paths debunked the globe model and prove the flat earth! the video everybody need to watch! . • flat earth is an archaic and scientifically disproven conception of.
Comments are closed.