Opinion The Supreme Court Blew A Chance To Fix Its Second Worst The u.s. court of appeals for the 11th circuit struck down much of the florida law, ruling that limiting platforms’ discretion over their content is likely unconstitutional. On sept. 29, the supreme court announced it would rule on whether to allow recent laws passed in florida and texas that restrict social media sites from removing certain users and posts .
Opinion If The Supreme Court Doesn T Upend The Internet Big Tech A supreme court opinion in the netchoice cases, far more than gonzalez v. google, has the potential to upend the laissez faire approach that courts have applied since the internet’s infancy. Justice samuel alito of the us supreme court asked this week what may be, to millions of average internet users, the most relatable question to come out of a pair of high stakes oral. The supreme court is currently weighing whether to take up arguments in two cases challenging laws passed by republicans in florida and texas that would ban digital platforms from moderating content based on political ideology. This week, the nine justices of the supreme court heard oral arguments in two cases that could change the internet. “these are not the nine greatest experts on the internet,” justice elena kagan.
The Internet S High Stakes Supreme Court Showdown Is Here The supreme court is currently weighing whether to take up arguments in two cases challenging laws passed by republicans in florida and texas that would ban digital platforms from moderating content based on political ideology. This week, the nine justices of the supreme court heard oral arguments in two cases that could change the internet. “these are not the nine greatest experts on the internet,” justice elena kagan. Supreme court justice elena kagan made the wryly self deprecating comment early in oral arguments for gonzalez v. google, a potential landmark case covering section 230 of the communications decency act of 1996. the remark was a nod to many people’s worst fears about the case. If the court backs provocative laws from texas and florida that limit social platforms’ ability to moderate content online, life could become radically different. The supreme court released opinions on two major social media cases on thursday, and the justices unanimously decided to not break the internet. the court could have used the cases to hold. This term at the supreme court saw a number of resounding wins for both online speech and internet users. in gonzalez v. google, twitter v. taamneh, and 3 03 creative v. elenis, the court.
Leave The Supreme Court Alone R Whitepeopletwitter Supreme court justice elena kagan made the wryly self deprecating comment early in oral arguments for gonzalez v. google, a potential landmark case covering section 230 of the communications decency act of 1996. the remark was a nod to many people’s worst fears about the case. If the court backs provocative laws from texas and florida that limit social platforms’ ability to moderate content online, life could become radically different. The supreme court released opinions on two major social media cases on thursday, and the justices unanimously decided to not break the internet. the court could have used the cases to hold. This term at the supreme court saw a number of resounding wins for both online speech and internet users. in gonzalez v. google, twitter v. taamneh, and 3 03 creative v. elenis, the court.
Comments are closed.