New York Times Opinion The New York Times Over 130 years ago, a young lawyer saw an amazing new gadget and had a revolutionary vision — technology can threaten our privacy. We must take back our privacy in post roe america, data collection could seriously undermine our liberty. over 130 years ago, a young lawyer saw an amazing new gadget and had a revolutionary vision: technology can threaten our privacy.
The Privacy Project The New York Times We need to take back our privacy from tech companies — even if that means sacrificing convenience. The new york times has made substantial changes to how we handle reader data, with an eye towards increased reader privacy. this includes better privacy practices around marketing,. The confidentiality that federal health privacy law provides to conversations with a doctor doesn’t always apply to prescriptions. in 2020, consumer reports exposed that goodrx, a popular drug discount and coupons service, was selling information on what medications people were searching or buying to facebook, google and other data marketing. Let’s be honest: data is useful. but we’re constantly told that in order to benefit from modern tech—and the insights that come with it—we have to give up our privacy. that useful data only comes from total access. that once your info is out there, you’ve lost control. that there’s no point in trying to protect it anymore. these are.
Opinion How The Times Thinks About Privacy The New York Times The confidentiality that federal health privacy law provides to conversations with a doctor doesn’t always apply to prescriptions. in 2020, consumer reports exposed that goodrx, a popular drug discount and coupons service, was selling information on what medications people were searching or buying to facebook, google and other data marketing. Let’s be honest: data is useful. but we’re constantly told that in order to benefit from modern tech—and the insights that come with it—we have to give up our privacy. that useful data only comes from total access. that once your info is out there, you’ve lost control. that there’s no point in trying to protect it anymore. these are. The authors of “system error” call for three reforms: a federally mandated right to privacy, revisions to the rules on informed consent so that consumers know what they are agreeing to and a. It’s not that we don’t value privacy (we care about it more than we think); it’s that we no longer expect it for ourselves or for others. which brings us back to that quest for. In a bombshell study and detailed post, the new york times team, stuart a. thompson and charlie warzel, uncovered how location tracking leaves every single one of us incredibly vulnerable. “recent inventions and business methods call attention to the next step which must be taken for the protection of the person,” wrote the lawyer, louis brandeis, warning that laws needed to keep up with technology and new means of surveillance, or americans would lose their “right to be let alone.”.
Comments are closed.