Provide Layer 3 Connectivity By Using Switch Virtual Interface

By hairstyler On Nov 13, 2025

Provide Layer 3 Connectivity By Using Switch Virtual Interface The verb provide has two different subcategorisation frames: provide something [ to somebody] provide somebody with something in the first, the material provided is the object, in the second the recipient is the object. both are valid, and both are in common use. the difference between them is the with phrase, which must be there to get meaning 2: if there is only one (direct) object, then. For example, the umbrellas provide shade for the guests. he provided drugs to the prisoners. in both of these examples, one could have swapped to and for, although the sentences as written feel more natural. is there a good rule to use when deciding whether to use to or for with provide? no doubt endless opining on this question is possible.

Activity-8 Configure Layer3 Switch Inter-VLAN Routing With Two Switches ...

Activity-8 Configure Layer3 Switch Inter-VLAN Routing With Two Switches ... The general distinction, gandalf, is that "provide something to someone" says that it's provided directly to the person concerned. whereas with "provide something for someone", it might be provided to an intermediary. for example, a food product company may provide a range of foods for vegetarians, but they provide the products to a retailer. In other words, these are questions of coherent and natural sounding phrasing, rather than strictly grammar, i believe. "provide for the common good" is an example of "provide" without an a and a b, by the way. you can "provide for" something, or "provision" something, or "provide" something to someone. Does provide need the preposition with, or is it truly ditransitive? kindly provide us with your best quotation kindly provide us your best quotation. he provided directions. he provided. 16 does the verb "provide" always have to be used with "with"? for example, can you provide me with some good examples? can you provide me some good examples? can you provide some good examples? i suppose it's a transitive verb, isn't it? moreover, is the following type of usage correct? you should provide food for your dog before you go on.

CCNA 3.4.b: Switch Virtual Interface (SVI) - EConfigs

CCNA 3.4.b: Switch Virtual Interface (SVI) - EConfigs Does provide need the preposition with, or is it truly ditransitive? kindly provide us with your best quotation kindly provide us your best quotation. he provided directions. he provided. 16 does the verb "provide" always have to be used with "with"? for example, can you provide me with some good examples? can you provide me some good examples? can you provide some good examples? i suppose it's a transitive verb, isn't it? moreover, is the following type of usage correct? you should provide food for your dog before you go on. Please provide a full sentence in which you intend to use these expressions. "would you provide us with rations?" or "would you provide us rations?". Is it grammatically correct " which is correct sentence: "please provide me with the following documents" or "please provide me the following documents". I have never heard provide us used where us is an indirect object. for example, there are 95 examples of provides us in the british national corpus, but all but two have provides us with. Provide to give something to a person, company, or organization, or to make it available for them to use: the government has pledged to provide over $1 billion in refinancing. provide sb with sth customers, suppliers, and contractors will be provided with the specialist training they need to work on the project.