Source Credibility Guide The Art Of Teaching

TEACHING GUIDE

TEACHING GUIDE When the script is done, any changes that it made to the environment are discarded. . script the above sources the script. it is as if the commands had been typed in directly. any environment changes are kept. source script this also sources the script. the source command is not required by posix and therefore is less portable than the shorter. Source is a shell keyword that is supposed to be used like this: source file where file contains valid shell commands. these shell commands will be executed in the current shell as if typed from the command line.

Art Of Teaching (Pedagogy) | PDF | Lecture | Learning

Art Of Teaching (Pedagogy) | PDF | Lecture | Learning 2 source is there for readability and self documentation, . exists because it is quick to type. the commands are identical. perl has long and short versions of many of its control variables for the same reason. You have an alias which is overriding the builtin source (fix with unalias source) you have a function which is overriding source (fix with unset f source) you are somehow not using bash (although your bang line would suggest you are). source is not posix. using source on dash does not work, only . works. Based on your solving attempt log the reason can be in version of vs code jupyter extension that periodically breaks this feature. e.g. for me 2025.5.2025051601 kernels are shown and 2025.7.2025072101 gives empty list. the solution is to "install specific version" under uninstall drop down menu to try some more stable not the latest version. I've read that bash source should be populated with the name of the executing script (and it works!). but why does bash source hold the name of the executing script, when it is defined in man bash as an array of source filenames corresponding to shell functions?.

The Art Of Teaching 2554 | PDF | Teaching And Learning

The Art Of Teaching 2554 | PDF | Teaching And Learning Based on your solving attempt log the reason can be in version of vs code jupyter extension that periodically breaks this feature. e.g. for me 2025.5.2025051601 kernels are shown and 2025.7.2025072101 gives empty list. the solution is to "install specific version" under uninstall drop down menu to try some more stable not the latest version. I've read that bash source should be populated with the name of the executing script (and it works!). but why does bash source hold the name of the executing script, when it is defined in man bash as an array of source filenames corresponding to shell functions?. What is the difference between sourcing ('.' or 'source') and executing a file in bash? ask question asked 13 years, 3 months ago modified 4 years, 8 months ago. A dangerous one liner that doesn't require source: export $(xargs <file) it can't handle comments, frequently used in environment files it can't handle values with whitespace, like in the question example it may unintentionally expand glob patterns into files if they match by any chance it's a bit dangerous because it passes the lines through bash expansion, but it has been useful to me when i. And most allow multiple sources before the final target if it makes sense to do so. that includes scp. some commands (like the gnu versions of cp and mv) have an option (e.g. t or target directory=directory) that allow you to put the target first but the default is the standard "source (s) before target". You have to source the file otherwise the aliases have a very short lifespan: the duration of the invoked shell. i have this in my .bashrc: if [ f ~/.bash aliases ]; then . ~/.bash aliases fi to read in the aliases. and this alias: alias realias='source ~/.bash aliases' at the beginning of my .bash aliases file. after an update i just issue the realias command.

Guide - Teaching And Learning Online PDF | PDF | Educational Technology ...

Guide - Teaching And Learning Online PDF | PDF | Educational Technology ... What is the difference between sourcing ('.' or 'source') and executing a file in bash? ask question asked 13 years, 3 months ago modified 4 years, 8 months ago. A dangerous one liner that doesn't require source: export $(xargs <file) it can't handle comments, frequently used in environment files it can't handle values with whitespace, like in the question example it may unintentionally expand glob patterns into files if they match by any chance it's a bit dangerous because it passes the lines through bash expansion, but it has been useful to me when i. And most allow multiple sources before the final target if it makes sense to do so. that includes scp. some commands (like the gnu versions of cp and mv) have an option (e.g. t or target directory=directory) that allow you to put the target first but the default is the standard "source (s) before target". You have to source the file otherwise the aliases have a very short lifespan: the duration of the invoked shell. i have this in my .bashrc: if [ f ~/.bash aliases ]; then . ~/.bash aliases fi to read in the aliases. and this alias: alias realias='source ~/.bash aliases' at the beginning of my .bash aliases file. after an update i just issue the realias command.

Source Credibility Guide - THE ART OF TEACHING

Source Credibility Guide - THE ART OF TEACHING And most allow multiple sources before the final target if it makes sense to do so. that includes scp. some commands (like the gnu versions of cp and mv) have an option (e.g. t or target directory=directory) that allow you to put the target first but the default is the standard "source (s) before target". You have to source the file otherwise the aliases have a very short lifespan: the duration of the invoked shell. i have this in my .bashrc: if [ f ~/.bash aliases ]; then . ~/.bash aliases fi to read in the aliases. and this alias: alias realias='source ~/.bash aliases' at the beginning of my .bash aliases file. after an update i just issue the realias command.

What Is Source Credibility Analysis? - The Language Library