The Supreme Courts Inexplicable Blow To The Voting Rights Act In

Supreme Court Stops Use Of Key Part Of Voting Rights Act - The ...

Supreme Court Stops Use Of Key Part Of Voting Rights Act - The ... The supreme court on thursday put on hold, at least for now, a ruling by a federal appeals court that could limit the power of the voting rights act. Experts in election law said the move signals that the court may be poised to further narrow the voting rights act.

Supreme Court Strikes Key Provisions Of The Voting Rights Act | Civic ...

Supreme Court Strikes Key Provisions Of The Voting Rights Act | Civic ... Republicans are increasingly bullish they can whittle away at the voting rights act (vra) as democrats renew a long shot effort to broaden the landmark law that turns 60 next week. In the hands of conservative opponents of voting rights, the supreme court has subjected the voting rights act to death by a thousand cuts. some of those cuts have been small, such as limiting how courts consider challenges brought under the law. and some have been large, as in the 2013 decision in shelby county v. State laws and constitutions have the potential to help fill the voting rights gap should the supreme court further erode the landmark law. but while these provisions could become even more important, they’re also a poor substitute for a strong federal standard. Reno, the supreme court has found racial gerrymanders when race is the central factor in drawing district lines and the state has no compelling interest in drawing such lines.

Voting Rights Act Faces Further Dismantling At Supreme Court : NPR

Voting Rights Act Faces Further Dismantling At Supreme Court : NPR State laws and constitutions have the potential to help fill the voting rights gap should the supreme court further erode the landmark law. but while these provisions could become even more important, they’re also a poor substitute for a strong federal standard. Reno, the supreme court has found racial gerrymanders when race is the central factor in drawing district lines and the state has no compelling interest in drawing such lines. Over the objections of three conservative justices, the high court on july 24 put a ruling by the st. louis based 8 th u.s. circuit court of appeals on hold while two native american tribes. On tuesday, two north dakota tribes—the turtle mountain band of chippewa indians and the spirit lake tribe—alongside three native american voters, petitioned the supreme court to block a lower. As of october 2025, the supreme court is poised to issue rulings in two cases that could fundamentally reshape american democracy. at stake is the future of the voting rights act of 1965, the single most effective piece of civil rights legislation in the nation’s history. the court’s decisions in louisiana v. Callais, the supreme court is considering whether louisiana’s effort to comply with section 2 of the voting rights act (vra), a law that bans racial discrimination in voting, is itself unconstitutional.

Might the Supreme Court gut a key part of the Voting Rights Act?