Were The Ancient Babylonians Far More Advanced Than We Thought Video

The Ancient Babylonians Were Far More Advanced Than We Thought ⋆ Axidava

The Ancient Babylonians Were Far More Advanced Than We Thought ⋆ Axidava From other's conversation,i found out they mentioned i was and sometimes they also mentioned i were. is there any rules for i was/were?. What is the difference between "were" and "have been", and are these sentences gramatically correct? 1) some of the best known writers of detective fiction in the twentieth century were women.

Evidence Ancient Babylonians Were Far More Advanced Than We Thought

Evidence Ancient Babylonians Were Far More Advanced Than We Thought Which of the following is correct ? who were these buildings designed by? or who was these buildings designed by? does were/was refer to "these buildings" or "who"?. Were ing (past continuous of be) is used to situations which were happening at a special time in the past and none hypothetical, it is more direct, not imaginative. If you were can also imply that you had planned to do it. "if i were going to go home in an hour, would you come?" does not describe an unlikely or impossible scenario. But i cannot rule out the possibility that indian english—and specifically indian political english—has evolved this usage of were to precisely in order to express firmness and caution in the same utterance. perhaps our indian readers could speak to this. † this use is called subjunctive in traditional grammar.

Ancient Babylonians Were More Advanced Than We Thought | Sasquatch ...

Ancient Babylonians Were More Advanced Than We Thought | Sasquatch ... If you were can also imply that you had planned to do it. "if i were going to go home in an hour, would you come?" does not describe an unlikely or impossible scenario. But i cannot rule out the possibility that indian english—and specifically indian political english—has evolved this usage of were to precisely in order to express firmness and caution in the same utterance. perhaps our indian readers could speak to this. † this use is called subjunctive in traditional grammar. I'm in trouble with the following sentence: how was/were the meals you had while you were gone? i think "how were" is correct, but why is "how was" wrong? please explain. We was is not standard english, it is used in some regional dialects: the verb 'to be' has two simple past forms in standard english i/he/she/it was and you/we/they were. apart from the special case of you, the distinction is, therefore, between singular was and plural were in some regional dialects, however, this pattern is not observed. in some parts of the country, speakers use was. That is, both "were to" (using the irrealis "were") and "was to" (using a past tense verb) would usually be interchangeable in a sentence structured similar to yours, but that would be if the sentence was in non fiction text. I learned from many sources that as if it were is accepted by all native english speakers. and as if it was is widely used, especially informally. but is the simple present indicative accepted as.

Evidence ancient Babylonians were far more advanced than we thought - BBC REEL