Who Were The Sultans Of Delhiconquest Of India Mongol Invasionsdelhi Sultanate History

Who Were The Sultans Of Delhi Conquest Of India Mongol Invasions From other's conversation,i found out they mentioned i was and sometimes they also mentioned i were. is there any rules for i was were?. What is the difference between "were" and "have been", and are these sentences gramatically correct? 1) some of the best known writers of detective fiction in the twentieth century were women.

Mongol Invasions Of India Delhi Sultanate Umair Mirza Free Were ing (past continuous of be) is used to situations which were happening at a special time in the past and none hypothetical, it is more direct, not imaginative. That is, both "were to" (using the irrealis "were") and "was to" (using a past tense verb) would usually be interchangeable in a sentence structured similar to yours, but that would be if the sentence was in non fiction text. Is there supposed to be was or were? i was thinking about was since it could be rephrased as: if any one of the devices was not switched off, do something. but maybe that does not make any sense at all. also, this is for a technical documentation where more formal language is preferred, not sure if that makes any difference. Technically, you should use 'were'. you are correct that the sentence is subjunctive because of the indefiniteness introduced by 'as though'. the subjunctive takes the plural form of the past tense of 'to be' as its auxiliary verb, even in the singular. having said that, many expert native english speakers will use 'was', both formally and informally. if writing in a formal context, it might.

Delhi Sultanate Map And Timeline Is there supposed to be was or were? i was thinking about was since it could be rephrased as: if any one of the devices was not switched off, do something. but maybe that does not make any sense at all. also, this is for a technical documentation where more formal language is preferred, not sure if that makes any difference. Technically, you should use 'were'. you are correct that the sentence is subjunctive because of the indefiniteness introduced by 'as though'. the subjunctive takes the plural form of the past tense of 'to be' as its auxiliary verb, even in the singular. having said that, many expert native english speakers will use 'was', both formally and informally. if writing in a formal context, it might. Purdue owl has this example which is almost identical to op's case: one of the boxes is open. the verb agrees with the subject, "one". if you wanted to talk about "two", you would use a plural verb: two of the successful managers were asked. one of the successful managers was asked. "if were" expresses the subjunctive mood, which refers to wishes and desires and is known as a "non factual" mood. if you're mentioning a possibility or a probability, a chance that something could be, use " was ". Consider the following sentence, from " introduction to control systems " by malgorzata zywno: note that if a summer were to be moved behind the block, the additional gain would be equal the value of the block gain, instead of its inverse. [bold mine] what does "were to be" mean there? as far as i know, this is a second type conditional sentence, and there should be " was " there (not " were. Were you able to attend the meeting yesterday? is used as the standard question. could you tends to be used for things that are going to happen in the future, for example could you attend the meeting next week? however i don't believe there are any strict rules governing what combinations of "could" or "was were able to" you are allowed to use.

Delhi Sultanate Map And Timeline Purdue owl has this example which is almost identical to op's case: one of the boxes is open. the verb agrees with the subject, "one". if you wanted to talk about "two", you would use a plural verb: two of the successful managers were asked. one of the successful managers was asked. "if were" expresses the subjunctive mood, which refers to wishes and desires and is known as a "non factual" mood. if you're mentioning a possibility or a probability, a chance that something could be, use " was ". Consider the following sentence, from " introduction to control systems " by malgorzata zywno: note that if a summer were to be moved behind the block, the additional gain would be equal the value of the block gain, instead of its inverse. [bold mine] what does "were to be" mean there? as far as i know, this is a second type conditional sentence, and there should be " was " there (not " were. Were you able to attend the meeting yesterday? is used as the standard question. could you tends to be used for things that are going to happen in the future, for example could you attend the meeting next week? however i don't believe there are any strict rules governing what combinations of "could" or "was were able to" you are allowed to use.