Why Chinas Ai Startup Deepseek Is Sending Shockwaves Through Global

Chinese AI Startup DeepSeek Sends Shockwaves Through AI Crypto Market ...

Chinese AI Startup DeepSeek Sends Shockwaves Through AI Crypto Market ... "why" can be compared to an old latin form qui, an ablative form, meaning how. today "why" is used as a question word to ask the reason or purpose of something. Why is it that everybody wants to help me whenever i need someone's help? why does everybody want to help me whenever i need someone's help? can you please explain to me the difference in mean.

Why China’s AI Startup DeepSeek Is Sending Shockwaves Through Global ...

Why China’s AI Startup DeepSeek Is Sending Shockwaves Through Global ... 8 1) please tell me why is it like that. [grammatically incorrect unless the punctuation is changed. please tell me: why is it like that? the question: "why is [etc.]" is a question form in english: why is the sky blue? why is it that children require so much attention? why is it [or some thing] like that?. Thus we say: you never know, which is why but you never know. that is why and goes on to explain: there is a subtle but important difference between the use of that and which in a sentence, and it has to do primarily with relevance. grammarians often use the terms "restrictive" and "non restrictive" when it comes to relative clauses. Why do you ask (the question)? in the first case, jane's expression makes "the answer" direct object predicate, in the second it makes "the question" direct object predicate; the subjects, being "i" and "you" respectively. There is no recorded reason why doe, except there was, and is, a range of others like roe. so it may have been a set of names that all rhymed and that law students could remember. or it could be that they were formed from a mnemonic, like the english pronouciation of a prayer or scripture in latin/greek.

What’s DeepSeek, China’s AI Startup Sending Shockwaves Through Global ...

What’s DeepSeek, China’s AI Startup Sending Shockwaves Through Global ... Why do you ask (the question)? in the first case, jane's expression makes "the answer" direct object predicate, in the second it makes "the question" direct object predicate; the subjects, being "i" and "you" respectively. There is no recorded reason why doe, except there was, and is, a range of others like roe. so it may have been a set of names that all rhymed and that law students could remember. or it could be that they were formed from a mnemonic, like the english pronouciation of a prayer or scripture in latin/greek. Since we can say "why can we grow taller?", "why cannot we grow taller?" is a logical and properly written negative. we don't say "why we can grow taller?" so the construct should not be "why we cannot grow taller?" the reason is that auxiliaries should come before the subject to make an interrogative. For why' can be idiomatic in certain contexts, but it sounds rather old fashioned. googling 'for why' (in quotes) i discovered that there was a single word 'forwhy' in middle english. Relative why can be freely substituted with that, like any restrictive relative marker. i.e, substituting that for why in the sentences above produces exactly the same pattern of grammaticality and ungrammaticality: the reason that he did it * the cause that he did it * the intention that he did it * the effect that he did it * the thing that. That's why pasta e fagioli comes out pastafazool, or capicola is pronounced something like gabbagool, in many italian dialects. (and yes, i did understand that you meant it doesn't happen in the word italian i'm just using italian words to demonstrate that it isn't an english phenomenon.).

What’s DeepSeek, China’s AI Startup Sending Shockwaves Through Global ...

What’s DeepSeek, China’s AI Startup Sending Shockwaves Through Global ... Since we can say "why can we grow taller?", "why cannot we grow taller?" is a logical and properly written negative. we don't say "why we can grow taller?" so the construct should not be "why we cannot grow taller?" the reason is that auxiliaries should come before the subject to make an interrogative. For why' can be idiomatic in certain contexts, but it sounds rather old fashioned. googling 'for why' (in quotes) i discovered that there was a single word 'forwhy' in middle english. Relative why can be freely substituted with that, like any restrictive relative marker. i.e, substituting that for why in the sentences above produces exactly the same pattern of grammaticality and ungrammaticality: the reason that he did it * the cause that he did it * the intention that he did it * the effect that he did it * the thing that. That's why pasta e fagioli comes out pastafazool, or capicola is pronounced something like gabbagool, in many italian dialects. (and yes, i did understand that you meant it doesn't happen in the word italian i'm just using italian words to demonstrate that it isn't an english phenomenon.).

What’s DeepSeek, China’s AI Startup Sending Shockwaves Through Global ...

What’s DeepSeek, China’s AI Startup Sending Shockwaves Through Global ... Relative why can be freely substituted with that, like any restrictive relative marker. i.e, substituting that for why in the sentences above produces exactly the same pattern of grammaticality and ungrammaticality: the reason that he did it * the cause that he did it * the intention that he did it * the effect that he did it * the thing that. That's why pasta e fagioli comes out pastafazool, or capicola is pronounced something like gabbagool, in many italian dialects. (and yes, i did understand that you meant it doesn't happen in the word italian i'm just using italian words to demonstrate that it isn't an english phenomenon.).

What’s DeepSeek, China’s AI Startup Sending Shockwaves Through Global ...

What’s DeepSeek, China’s AI Startup Sending Shockwaves Through Global ...

What’s DeepSeek, China’s AI startup sending shockwaves through global tech?